<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deploying on Phusion Passenger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/comment-page-1/#comment-47461</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/#comment-47461</guid>
		<description>what would be a good way to try rails on a small vps? (must be slim and low-latency is a must - must also play nice with an existing site on the same server (mostly php and perl - I would drop the idea quicksmart if I were to be told that i would have to significantly alter configs for php or other critical stuff used by the current site) ... maybe a fastcgi daemon? ... what sort of memory requirements would I be looking at ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what would be a good way to try rails on a small vps? (must be slim and low-latency is a must &#8211; must also play nice with an existing site on the same server (mostly php and perl &#8211; I would drop the idea quicksmart if I were to be told that i would have to significantly alter configs for php or other critical stuff used by the current site) &#8230; maybe a fastcgi daemon? &#8230; what sort of memory requirements would I be looking at ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHP Application Development</title>
		<link>http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/comment-page-1/#comment-18259</link>
		<dc:creator>PHP Application Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/#comment-18259</guid>
		<description>Hi There,
commercial supported open source product that enables people to deploy their Ruby on Rails applications useful for developers at deploying even small Rails applications can be frustrating.

Thanks,
Mick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi There,<br />
commercial supported open source product that enables people to deploy their Ruby on Rails applications useful for developers at deploying even small Rails applications can be frustrating.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Mick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keil Miller</title>
		<link>http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/comment-page-1/#comment-18157</link>
		<dc:creator>Keil Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/#comment-18157</guid>
		<description>@David Ruby is a way better language than php. In fact, it&#039;s the easiest and least error prone language I have found so far. Rails makes development easy to set up and understand.

However, there isn&#039;t enough support (compared to php) to have clients make the switch. I wish php would just die already, but we are in the same predicament as windows. Everyone else uses it. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David Ruby is a way better language than php. In fact, it&#8217;s the easiest and least error prone language I have found so far. Rails makes development easy to set up and understand.</p>
<p>However, there isn&#8217;t enough support (compared to php) to have clients make the switch. I wish php would just die already, but we are in the same predicament as windows. Everyone else uses it. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thompson</title>
		<link>http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/comment-page-1/#comment-17961</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://railsforphp.com/2008/05/13/deploying-on-phusion-passenger/#comment-17961</guid>
		<description>Hi. Do you still feel this way about rails deployment. Are you leaning further away from PHP and towards Rails. I&#039;m asking because I&#039;m trying to decide between the two. 

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Do you still feel this way about rails deployment. Are you leaning further away from PHP and towards Rails. I&#8217;m asking because I&#8217;m trying to decide between the two. </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

